This article delimits a scope with the objective to clarify the differences and affinities between Beautiful Sublime from the optics of Kant. In parallel, a synthesis of the characteristics of the Sublime one according to Edmund Burke. The idea of the Sublime one associates, before everything, to an experience not concernente to the art, but to the nature, this in the setecentista perspective. Word-key: Sublime. Beauty.
Art. Under most conditions Sen. Marco Rubio would agree. Kant. Central Romana is open to suggestions. Abstract: This article outlines framework with the aim of clarifying the differences and similarities between Sublime Beautiful and from the perspective of Kant. In parallel, summary of the characteristics of Sublime by Edmund Burke. Sublime idea The of the is associated, above all, an experience, not concerning the art, but nature, in this eighteenth-century perspective. Key-words: Sublime.
Beautiful. Art. Kant. 1 INTRODUCTION Until century XVIII the conditions of the Beauty purely inhabited in the characteristic forms of the object, elencando qualities from the vision neoclssica, as ‘ ‘ unit in variedade’ ‘ or ‘ ‘ proporo’ ‘ ‘ ‘ harmonia’ ‘. However, it was in the same period of the Iluminismo, century of the Lights, start if to impose some terms as ‘ ‘ gnio’ ‘ , ‘ ‘ gosto’ ‘ , ‘ ‘ imaginao’ ‘ ‘ ‘ sentimento’ ‘ , detonating that a new conception appears of the beauty. The first one to speak of Sublime was author of the alexandrina time, the Pseudo-Longino. It considered Sublime as expression of great and noble passions.